Showing posts with label DAPL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DAPL. Show all posts

Monday, November 21, 2016

The November 20 Bridge Standoff

Law enforcement officers surround demonstrators protesting against plans to pass the Dakota Access pipeline during a standoff at the Backwater Bridge in Morton County, North Dakota, U.S., November 20, 2016. © Morton County Sheriff's Department / Handout via Reuters

If you look at the temperature in Cannon Ball, North Dakota last night you’ll see that it was hovering around 23 degrees Farhenheit for most of the night. Protesters were out all night, fighting against the DAPL, as they have been for months now. As if this cold wasn’t hard enough to withstand, they were attacked by police, with rubber bullets, tear gas, an LRAD cannon (tested, but not used in any of the video I watched), mace, percussion grenades, and a water cannon. Yes, a water cannon in freezing weather. After watching Kevin Gilbertt’s live videos for much of last night, there were a few things I learned. I'll cite the time each event occurs/is noted in the 30 minute shortened video I compiled.

Mainstream media has failed us, and their replacements are under attack:
3 drones belonging to Digital Smoke Signals were shot down (29:35). The FAA has issued a no fly zone for private aircraft, including drones, in the area of the protests [1]. You may remember when Shailene Woodley was singled out and arrested, while obeying orders to move [2]. Many thought it was likely that this was a way to silence her live videos, as many were watching the situation unfold on her streams. Protesters have claimed authorities jammed cell phone signals at some points, this has been disputed, and the problems may be due to spotty coverage. However, the coincidence that those problems occurred when police began breaking down a protester camp seems suspect. Even if the latter two claims are incorrect, the no fly zone is only to attack the protester's communication with the outside world. The protesters are flying drones with video, not missile systems, and they pose no threat to the police, apart from the threat that their actions will become public.

Protesters' lives and well-being are in immediate danger:
There have been a number of health issues. One person required CPR, twelve people have gone to the ER, and at least 100 people were transported back to the main camp from injuries related to tear gas or the cold temperature and water (29:48). There is also a claim that a man was severely injured by a bean bag round, with his skull exposed, attested to by more than one protester (22:24).

They are attempting to discredit the movement:
The Morton County Police Department is releasing factually inaccurate propaganda. They claimed that the water protesters were setting fires and that they used the water cannon in an attempt to put those out. The only protester-started fires visible in the hours of footage I’ve watched are small, controlled camp fires for warmth, a necessity when police spray water in crowds in these temperatures (21:43). These fires have not been targeted by the water cannon, and indeed in all the footage I've seen the cannon was only targeting the protesters. There were some other fires, but from what I saw it appeared that the police set them, and water protectors rushed to put them out.

What can you do?:
Remove your money from banks that support DAPL, call the governor of North Dakota (701-328-2200), the Morton Co. Sheriff's Office (701-667-3330), the White House (202-456-1111), the EPA (404-562-9077), Amnesty International (202-544-0200), and anyone else you think could make an impact. Block the buildings of banks that support DAPL in a protest of solidarity. If you want to donate, here is a link so you can help them survive the winter. And of course if you can, head out there, they need more bodies.


My main sources are videos from the scene. If you don’t trust me, please, take a look for yourself:
Kevin Gilbert Facebook Page (I recommend following him for updates)

full videos:

Tuesday, November 15, 2016

DAPL: Dangers and Solutions

The amount of attention the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) protests have gotten is a great first step, but it's not enough. There are two main problems with the reaction to these protests- knowledge of the issue, and knowledge of how to help.

Pipelines & DAPL:
The media coverage has been minimal at best, and more has likely been learned through social media than major media organizations. This isn't something we can really change, except perhaps through boycotts, but we can spread information on the topic individually, to friends and acquaintances through social media and in person.

Even those who know about the situation in North Dakota often have an incomplete understanding. Two things to emphasize are the danger of pipelines, and the fact that DAPL is only one of many pipelines under construction or in use. Between 2010 and 2015 in the US there were over 3,300 spills or leaks (that's over 13 every week!), resulting in a total of over seven million gallons of spilled oil [1]. Spills have a wide range of environmental and health impacts, depending on the type of oil or gas. DAPL would be transporting crude oil, which has a variety of harmful compounds, such as benzene, a known carcinogen [2]. These pipelines generally run through poorer, often minority communities, an example of environmental racism. For instance, the DAPL was moved to the current path through Native American land because a route passing above Bismarck was deemed to dangerous for the water supply of Bismarck residents [3].

There's already over 2.4 million miles worth of oil and gas pipelines in the United states, with many more in the planning or construction stage [4]. Increasing this infrastructure is unecessary and dangerous. We should be increasing renewable energy subsidies and production, which means we should be using less pipelines if anything.

What You Can Do
You can of course get involved with environmental groups or show up to DAPL solidarity protests in your area. However, there's another option that could be very effective if many people join:

Remove your money from a corporate bank, opting instead for credit unions. This not only impacts this issue but a variety of other big-banked back corporate endeavors. Credit unions aren't perfect, but they're certainly better than corporate banks. This is not an option for some, but membership to most credit unions isn't as exclusive as you might think. This shift could considerably impact the power of banks to loan money to sponsor these projects. Here's a link to find a credit union you're eligible for:
CUlookup

And here's Matthew Cooke, a proponent of this action:
CALL TO ACTION: MASS BANK EXIT

[1]: http://www.foreffectivegov.org/blog/map-displays-five-years-oil-pipeline-spills
[2]: http://www.bioline.org.br/request?er07041
[3]: http://bismarcktribune.com/news/state-and-regional/pipeline-route-plan-first-called-for-crossing-north-of-bismarck/article_64d053e4-8a1a-5198-a1dd-498d386c933c.html
[4]: http://www.pipeline101.com/Where-Are-Pipelines-Located