Showing posts with label RT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RT. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

Russian Conspiracies- a New Brand of McCarthyism?



Joseph McCarthy was a republican when he began his immoral and oppressive crackdown on left-wing thinkers in the US. What many seem not to know, however, is that McCarthy enjoyed support from the democrats as well. Before McCarthy even started, democratic president Harry Truman issued Executive Order 9835, which removed government employees deemed unloyal to the United States. Grounds for removal included:

             "Membership in, affiliation with or sympathetic association with any foreign or domestic organization, association, movement, group or combination of persons, designated by the Attorney General as totalitarian, fascist, communist, or subversive, or as having adopted a policy of advocating or approving the commission of acts of force or violence to deny other persons their rights under the Constitution of the United States, or as seeking to alter the form of government of the United States by unconstitutional means." [1]

The congressional committees tasked with exposing and charging communists were often headed or staffed with democrats. For instance, after McCarthy stepped down from the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations democrat John McClellan took over as chair, and Robert Kennedy was appointed as chief council [2]. Under McClellan the committee went after labor unions, leading to the Landrum-Griffith act, which barred communists from serving in leadership positions in unions [3].

I fear we are heading towards a similar situation. In my last post, I discussed the movement towards censorship, which is supported by both liberals and republicans. The EU resolution to counteract Russian propaganda was proposed by Anna Fotyga, a member of the right-wing Law and Justice party in Poland. But in the US the attack on Russian Media is widely led by the democrats, claiming that Russia was rigging the election through revealing the inner workings of the democratic party [4]. While Russian media is obviously not impartial, some liberals have begun condemning anyone who lends credibility to anything from Russian media sources.

Propornot, a group that refuses to reveal their identities or methods, has compiled a list of news organizations that are helping Russia's propaganda effort, intentionally or unknowingly. This list includes many alt-right websites largely devoid of evidence or sources, but it also includes many well-regarded, trustworthy left-wing publications, such as Truthdig and Naked Capitalism. They even list wikileaks, an organization which has done nothing but spread valid leaked documents [5]. This is far worse than just an irrelevant group of wackos condemning valid media, because now the Washington Post has run an article using this group's 'research' as a source [6]. This is fake news. This is propaganda.

If the liberals turn on the far left as they have throughout history, Trump-like leaders will continue to emerge. If we want to move forward, the fear-mongering has to stop, and liberals need to admit that neoliberal policies are how we got Trump. I don't mean to assign blame, as I think that's counterproductive. I do mean to push people to look at the causes of the fascist right's success, and to look at the rampant corruption and corporatism of their own party.

[1]: http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/executive-order-9835/
[2]: http://www.hsgac.senate.gov//imo/media/doc/psihistory.htm?attempt=2
[3]: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1120618?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[4]: http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/02/opinions/kremlin-trying-to-rig-election-nimmo-opinion/
[5]: http://www.propornot.com/p/the-list.html
[6]: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/washington-post-blacklist-story-is-shameful-disgusting-w452543

Monday, November 28, 2016

Censorship With Good Intentions Will End Badly

Censorship is not a quality of a free society. It also rarely goes with left wing politics, as it usually goes hand in hand with the oppression that leftists fight. Currently there are some disturbing calls for censorship coming from the left. The EU just passed a non-binding resolution to counter Russian and Islamic terrorist propaganda [1], and many are calling for Facebook and Google to do something about the fake news that was shared on social media throughout this election.

I'm not going to argue the morality of actually trying to censor fake information- I think it's generally wrong but that would be a lengthy philosophical argument. However, I will argue that these two methods of attempting to filter false information are not going to only counteract fake news, but will also be aimed at certain valid viewpoints. I would be fine with attempting to distribute correct information to counteract the false information, but that would require an unbiased group to provide corrections, and the EU and corporations certainly aren't unbiased.

Russian media has a variety of viewpoints depending on the show or paper. Many of the RT America writers and Lee Camp are very left wing. They may have selective coverage, but I have not seen anything stated as fact that they can't back up. They also don't just spread fake news- when one of Sputnik's editors, Bill Moran, accidentally published a factually incorrect article he apologized profusely and was promptly fired. He was a bit overworked, and had attributed an attached article to the sender of an email, making it appear that Sidney Blumenthal had criticized Clinton's handling of the Bengazi situation. Afterwards, he attempted to make things right, explaining that it was a personal error. The individual who had written the article he had misattributed to Blumenthal, Kurt Eichenwald, attempted to stop him, alleging that the article was intentionally incorrect Russian propaganda. Eichenwald offered to help Moran find a new job if he remained silent, and if Moran spoke on the issue Eichenwald threatened to attack his credibility [2].

This shows a willingness to make up a Russia conspiracy where there is none. I'm not saying that Russian news agencies don't have an agenda, but I will say they don't, to my knowledge, intentionally publish factually incorrect news. I also think these attacks display a hypocrisy. Major American news sources have been publishing misinformation throughout the election cycle. On CNN, an anchor claimed it was illegal to possess the Wikileaks emails unless you were a journalist [3]. The Washington Post recently published an article on inaccuracies and bias within RT, which ironically was full of unsubstantiated claims (I know this is an RT link, but they back up their statements) [4]. Many reporters from a variety of news organizations were found to be working closely with Clinton's campaign, via leaked emails [5]. This is just a small selection of these issues, which present a troubling view of corporate media, and their intentions.

On The Intercept, a news organization I regard with some respect, a normally rational and forward-thinking columnist has called for Facebook to self-regulate when it comes to fake news [6]. This is a frightening prospect. Self regulation of corporations does not work, as corporations are driven by profits. The interests of CEO's rarely fall in line with the interests of the working class. What's happened when industries have self-regulated previously? Financial crashes [7], big tobacco avoiding safety warnings and thus killing millions [8], health care prices skyrocketing (remember Martin Shkreli?) [9], and Pharmaceutical industries misleading patients [10] to name a few. Zuckerberg has vowed to go after fake news in a variety of ways [11], but I don't think their methods of determining what is fake will be adequate. In many issues Americans have a very biased perspective of what is fake- just look at most Americans' view of the Syrian situation. Assad may be an oppressive tyrant, but the resistance is partially composed of right wing Islamist militants, such as the Muslim Brotherhood [12]. Would this censorship be used against the mainstream US media organizations I mentioned earlier as well?

The EU's declaration isn't concrete, which makes it hard to point out specific faults. The intention to go after Russian media is alarming though, as the EU is hardly an unbiased organization, regularly supporting corporate agendas (for instance [13]). And their history when it comes to propaganda is not far above that of the US, just look at the British government's anti-communist propaganda from the '40s and '50s [14]. Furthermore, Ukraine passed a law in 2015 banning communist and national socialist propaganda. The EU recommended that they revise this law, but also claimed that it "pursue[d] a legitimate aim" [15]. Anger over fake news stories spread by the alt-right is understandable, but we need to counteract it without government or corporate intervention. Censorship from corporations and corporate-influenced governments is not something we on the left should endorse, regardless of the legitimate problems with fake news from right-wing organizations.


[3]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/10/17/remember-its-illegal-to-possess-wikileaks-clinton-emails-but-its-different-for-the-media-says-cnns-chris-cuomo/?utm_term=.a56dbbce8961
[4]: https://www.rt.com/op-edge/368180-fake-news-washington-post/
[5]: https://theintercept.com/2016/10/09/exclusive-new-email-leak-reveals-clinton-campaigns-cozy-press-relationship/
[6]: https://theintercept.com/2016/11/10/facebook-im-begging-you-please-make-yourself-better/
[7]: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-self-regulation-of-the-financial-system-wont-work/
[8]: http://www.who.int/bulletin/archives/78(7)902.pdf
[9]: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/10/12/taking-on-the-drug-profiteers
[10]: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/02/150217144321.htm
[11]: http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/19/technology/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-fake-news-election/
[12]: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9450587/Muslim-Brotherhood-establishes-militia-inside-Syria.html
[13]: https://off-guardian.org/2016/08/23/european-commission-serving-a-corporate-agenda/
[14]: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/26637/1/08806632.pdf
[15]: http://uatoday.tv/news/venice-commission-ukraine-law-banning-communist-nazi-propaganda-not-comply-with-eu-standards-557297.html